TV/media critic, Howard Rosenberg, raises a question that was raised and discussed years ago at Court TV. Few at the time, and certainly not Steve Brill, were advocates, and all the issues of taste, appropriateness, value and purpose were discussed.
Long before the appearance of hostage murders in Iraq showed on the internet, the idea of having some kind of secure webcast was considered. If as many people are in favor of the death penalty as reported, it is a valid question to ask: should those in favor have the opportunity to see what the ultimate penalty is like? The death penalty represents society's judgment that the value of deterrence/revenge/closure is appropriate and justified. If the Supreme Court holds that, unless specific other other circumstances exist, the death penalty is not "cruel and unusual; punishment", then perhaps society should have some means of access. If its too repugnant or difficult to view, except for those closest to the case and victim, then perhaps there are deeper questions to consider.